DNA is easily the most important tool to come along for the genealogist in quite some time. DNA is the definitive answer for who is and isn't related. What it cannot do is tell us about the people. It cannot tell us who entered into a land agreement or when. It cannot hint at struggles our ancestors faced coming to America or heading west into the wilds of Kentucky. It cannot tell us when someone got married, that can only be done by what I call "butt-time"; time spent on the Internet, in a courthouse, or in a research center. What it can, and has done, is locate relatives we didn't know we even had, and answer the question if two people are or are not related. Below are the DNA markers for three Ham(m)on(d)(s) families, Ambrose Hammon (1647-1694), from who I descend, those who descend from Martin Hammond, and a third whose name is annonymous, but whose haplotype is listed. At some point I hope to have as many different Ham(m)on(d)(s) family trees as possible available so we can more easily help each other find the right tree. DYS Markers 1-25
DYS Markers 26-37
DYS Markers 38-47
DYS Markers 48-67
The values listed for Ambrose are my* actual DNA results while those listed for Martin Hammond are from Jim Main's cousin, Mr. Hammond**, while R1b1b2 is the haplogroup for the third family. They may not be a 100% match to our actual ancestor, but there should be enough matches to indicate if one is related to one of these trees. The numbers in red and blue indicate differences from Ambrose and as one can see, there is a significant difference between our family and the other two. This large difference is further supported by haplotype testing; those belonging to the Ambrose line are J2b* (formally J2e1) while those belonging to the Martin line are I1a-AS-10, and the third is R1b1b2. Haplogroups "I" and "R" are two of the most common northeastern (including England, Scotland, and Ireland) haplogroups. It should also be noted that less than a perfect match does not exclude individuals from being related. Some genes mutate faster than others and it is possible that a mutation could occur between brothers, leaving them less than a perfect match. Below are the known matches as of August 15, 2008. Out of curteousy for their privacy, I will only list names and no other information.
Who should do DNA from a genealogical standpoint? Anyone who is interested in finding relatives and confirming lineage. If you know for a fact that you are related to me then there is no reason to do so. DNA testing is not cheap (25-markers is $149) so it would be useless for my brother to have his tested (unless our Mother hasn't told us something!). Links to DNA sites: |